Mazda CX-5 The CX-5 CUV debuts Mazda's SKYACTIV® TECHNOLOGY and is unique for its impressive fuel economy, responsive handling and bold style

Cx5 fuel octane recommendations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 02:47 PM
  #41  
Callisto's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 10,665
Likes: 233
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by BoomerZoomr
I worked in a refinery that produces top tier gasoline for 30 years. I worked in the field tasting, smelling and touching each component of all fuels. I worked for over a decade behind a wall of computer screens blending all fuels. I operated RON and MON engines testing fuel octane. I am aware of all characteristics of gasoline, and how each spec affects the other specs. I blended the special gasoline that manufacturers use to determine their mileage and emissions numbers.
I know gasoline…
So while your past history (you did say retired) is actually very impressive for what you did it does not enter into the end product of what you contributed your knowledge and real-world diagnostics and testing how they affect some of the few things I mentioned.


 

Last edited by Callisto; Sep 25, 2025 at 02:57 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 03:16 PM
  #42  
BoomerZoomr's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
From: U.S.A.
Default

Originally Posted by Callisto
So while your past history (you did say retired) is actually very impressive for what you did it does not enter into the end product of what you contributed your knowledge and real-world diagnostics and testing how they affect some of the few things I mentioned.
Okie Dokie… I am still waiting to hear how 87 octane disables a vehicle’s monitoring sensors…
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 03:19 PM
  #43  
retread888's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 220
Likes: 2
From: earth
Default

Originally Posted by BoomerZoomr
My advice would be to always use a top tier gasoline… there is a lot of testing that is done before gasoline is shipped out of the refinery.
-+ 25 cents -87-89 / +25 cents -89-91
and 87-91 - + 50 cents spread - my tank holds 15 g so its about $7 more but i usually fill up at 1/2 tank so for another $3 - i dont mind - the base price is low and when you get over 30 mpg - well its a fractional upgrade for what i see as a big benifit- freeway I can usually get about 500 miles on one tank -


 

Last edited by retread888; Sep 25, 2025 at 03:25 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 03:51 PM
  #44  
BoomerZoomr's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
From: U.S.A.
Default

Where I live the Chevron 87 is $2.56 and their 93 is $3.36
That's for the ethanol gasoline.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 04:43 PM
  #45  
Charlescrown's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2025
Posts: 423
Likes: 26
From: Padstow
Default

Hey BoomerZoomer that's an impressive past career with fuel. Very few people know that a special blend of fuel (which is unavailable to the public) is used to determine fuel economy and emissions. Kinda like cheating in my books.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 04:54 PM
  #46  
Callisto's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 10,665
Likes: 233
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by boomerzoomr
okie dokie… i am still waiting to hear how 87 octane disables a vehicle’s monitoring sensors…
i never said it did!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 04:57 PM
  #47  
Callisto's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 10,665
Likes: 233
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by Charlescrown
Hey BoomerZoomer that's an impressive past career with fuel. Very few people know that a special blend of fuel (which is unavailable to the public) is used to determine fuel economy and emissions. Kinda like cheating in my books.
Thats not what he said....and it was open ended!
The CCA and EPA and California (LOL) would have a different story if that were true!
 

Last edited by Callisto; Sep 25, 2025 at 05:01 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 05:12 PM
  #48  
BoomerZoomr's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
From: U.S.A.
Default

Originally Posted by Charlescrown
Hey BoomerZoomer that's an impressive past career with fuel. Very few people know that a special blend of fuel (which is unavailable to the public) is used to determine fuel economy and emissions. Kinda like cheating in my books.
Nobody told me this, but looking at the specs I would say the manufacturers requirements for their test fuel wasn’t better than consumer fuel, and actually was probably worse. One example is, we even added sulfur to their fuel. So I am assuming the test fuel was kind of a worse case scenario… in other words, the real world numbers consumers would produce would be no worse than required by government.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 05:26 PM
  #49  
BoomerZoomr's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
From: U.S.A.
Default

Originally Posted by Callisto
i never said it did!!!!!
"enables monitoring sensors reporting to the ECU" is what you said premium gasoline would do.
logic would dictate the sensors were previously disabled, to be enabled by the premium fuel.
logic would also dictate the 87 octane gas contributed to the disabled sensors.

occasionally using premium gas seems like occasionally using birth control… IMO
if I desired the extra fuel detergent that premium gasoline provides, I would simply add a bottle of it to the gas tank around every oil change. But I purchase only 93 octane gasoline, so no worries on my end.


 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2025 | 05:34 PM
  #50  
Callisto's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 10,665
Likes: 233
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by BoomerZoomr
Nobody told me this, but looking at the specs I would say the manufacturers requirements for their test fuel wasn’t better than consumer fuel, and actually was probably worse. One example is, we even added sulfur to their fuel. So I am assuming the test fuel was kind of a worse case scenario… in other words, the real world numbers consumers would produce would be no worse than required by government.
Ok your age is showing... (joke I am likely older or close to your age believe it or not).

Sulfur in gasoline will harm a *Catalitic converter. A vehcle *using it would not only run very poorly but fail any tail pipe emission sampling. So either you are just really old and your education in your field of studies dates back to the 1960s ,1970s and early 1980s or you meant to say before CATs were used?
I also have many friends and have posted this that work for various auto manufactures a couple are actually head of the powertrain development departments (1 now retired was the main guy for Chrysler for almost 2 decades.). I can assure you if an special fuel was used they would have mentioned it to me knowing how I am about fuels specifically for my vehicle I professionally have raced for decades in NHRA and SCCA.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.