Mazda Protege This compact model offers an economical solution for the need for a sporty sedan or wagon.

problem missfire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 11-01-2013, 04:33 PM
Berto24's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 41
Default


here is dyno graph the FPR is new and the plugs looked burned
 
  #12  
Old 11-01-2013, 05:01 PM
Kevinkpk's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 444
Default

Graph rules out turbo. Looks like a 100 rpm (dosen't like) from 5.7- 5.8K then max's out. Has this been since "day one", or just start?
 
  #13  
Old 11-01-2013, 05:04 PM
Kevinkpk's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 444
Default

You have injectors for an 800cc? Is there anything a little larger you can install? Adding to the idle issue, have you inspected the fuel regulator? This MIGHT have an issue of rpm drop (misfire) at the higher rpm.
 

Last edited by Kevinkpk; 11-01-2013 at 05:08 PM. Reason: This MIGHT have an issue of rpm drop (misfire) at the higher rpm
  #14  
Old 11-01-2013, 05:13 PM
Berto24's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Kevinkpk
You have injectors for an 800cc? Is there anything a little larger you can install? Adding to the idle issue, have you inspected the fuel regulator? This MIGHT have an issue of rpm drop (misfire) at the higher rpm.
Those injectors are huge I only needed 2.0 Protege injectors wich they are 300cc. And the rpm drop was when i was braking most of the times keep dropping until I stall. that missfire at 5700rpm I dont know what it is I dont feel anything out the ordinary. Yes the Fuel pressure regulator is working nicely.
 
  #15  
Old 11-01-2013, 05:47 PM
UseYourNoggin's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,635
Default

I didn't realize this was a turbo unit with a ridiculously oversize exhaust.

The intercooler if it's front mounted especially could be sucking in air.

The exhaust is another issue. Seriously, 3" exhaust for a 1.6 ltr? That's way to big, especially since your down pipe is 2.5"

A small restrictive pipe would immediately fill with exhaust, and move at a considerable velocity, but excess gas would be left behind, which in the worst case scenario would actually remain in the combustion chamber and mix with the incoming fresh air, reducing power.
A large pipe would immediately absorb all the exhaust volume, but drop velocity. Exhaust would still flow out, but would not be as efficient as it could be.

Example; If anything, some of the catbacks are actually reducing overall power, because they're slowing down what little exhaust velocity there is, by the time it gets done going through the twists and honeycombs of doom."

Your exhaust is bigger than your downpipe which could be helping causing your misfire.
The 2.5" is more than adequate for a 1.6 ltr turbo. According to Garrett, your downpipe should be at least 1.25X the diameter of the turbine wheel.
 

Last edited by UseYourNoggin; 11-01-2013 at 06:57 PM.
  #16  
Old 11-01-2013, 07:37 PM
Kevinkpk's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 444
Default

Originally Posted by UseYourNoggin
The exhaust is another issue. Seriously, 3" exhaust for a 1.6 ltr? That's way to big, especially since your down pipe is 2.5"

A small restrictive pipe would immediately fill with exhaust, and move at a considerable velocity, but excess gas would be left behind, which in the worst case scenario would actually remain in the combustion chamber and mix with the incoming fresh air, reducing power.
A large pipe would immediately absorb all the exhaust volume, but drop velocity. Exhaust would still flow out, but would not be as efficient as it could be. This will cause pressure increase, thus the exhaust will be "backed up" The sizing you have is for something (less turbo) alot larger, as Noggin states the turbine diameter has to be included for exhaust sizing.

Example; If anything, some of the catbacks are actually reducing overall power, because they're slowing down what little exhaust velocity there is, by the time it gets done going through the twists and honeycombs of doom."

Your exhaust is bigger than your downpipe which could be helping causing your misfire.
The 2.5" is more than adequate for a 1.6 ltr turbo. According to Garrett, your downpipe should be at least 1.25X the diameter of the turbine wheel.
Mine in red, with the last part of noggins quote in red, my concur (for what thats worth). Reason the turbine diameter is for calculating exhaust flow through it, and in this case 1.25 x is what is stated
 
  #17  
Old 11-01-2013, 09:42 PM
Berto24's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 41
Default

Well my turbine is .63 AR 2.5 outlet for what is worth my previous exhaust setup was 2.5 DP with 2 1/4 custom exhaust since going 3 I spool my turbo 300rpm sooner and I fell the car with more power but to prove IF I lose or gain power I will dyno the car again and compare with the old graph
 
  #18  
Old 11-01-2013, 10:11 PM
Kevinkpk's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 444
Default

Originally Posted by Berto24
Well my turbine is .63 AR 2.5 outlet for what is worth my previous exhaust setup was 2.5 DP with 2 1/4 custom exhaust since going 3 I spool my turbo 300rpm sooner and I fell the car with more power but to prove IF I lose or gain power I will dyno the car again and compare with the old graph
Is the .63 in mm (inlet), and the exhuast in in?
 
  #19  
Old 11-01-2013, 10:34 PM
Berto24's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Kevinkpk
Is the .63 in mm (inlet), and the exhuast in in?
Dont understand
 
  #20  
Old 11-02-2013, 08:09 AM
UseYourNoggin's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,635
Default

Originally Posted by Berto24
Well my turbine is .63 AR 2.5 outlet for what is worth my previous exhaust setup was 2.5 DP with 2 1/4 custom exhaust since going 3 I spool my turbo 300rpm sooner and I fell the car with more power but to prove IF I lose or gain power I will dyno the car again and compare with the old graph
As far as exhaust is concerned, from a 2.5" downpipe to a 3" exhaust, will mean your exhaust velocity will slow down and the turbo must push more total exhaust displacement (larger pipe). The optimal in your case should be a 2.5" exhaust to match your downpipe.
I know people with turbos go to 3" exhaust but they have bigger engines and a 3" downpipe. I've even read on the internet where they have 3" downpipes with 2.5" exhaust (not a fan of), but going the other way with a small engine like you are doing isn't a really good thing especially with low boost (I believe your boost was 6 as per dyno sheet).
Thanks for understanding and being calm!

Nov 3: "As for 2.5" vs. 3.0", the "best" turboback exhaust depends on the amount of flow, or horsepower. At 250 hp, 2.5" is fine. Going to 3" at this power level won't get you much, if anything, other than a louder exhaust note. 300 hp and you're definitely suboptimal with 2.5". For 400-450 hp, even 3" is on the small side.”
"Other things you can do (in addition to choosing an appropriate diameter) to minimize exhaust backpressure in a turboback exhaust are: avoid crush-bent tubes (use mandrel bends); avoid tight-radius turns (keep it as straight as possible); avoid step changes in diameter (especially rear cat further down); avoid "cheated" radii (cuts that are non-perpendicular); use a high flow cat; use a straight-thru perforated core muffler... etc.”

My .02: if you have a 2.5" downpipe, use a 2.5" mandrel bent exhaust with a 2.5" hi flow rear cat and straight-thru perforated core muffler.
If you have a 3" exhaust with a 2.5" rear main cat, you've done a bad thing because you go from 2.5" downpipe to 3" exhaust to 2.5" rear cat and back to 3"?
 

Last edited by UseYourNoggin; 11-03-2013 at 10:08 AM. Reason: Nov 3 @ bottom


Quick Reply: problem missfire



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 PM.