Went to look at the new cx5 diesel
FWIW and only my personal opinion: After the VW diesel scandal and having owned a VW Golf TDI in the past, I now dislike diesel cars and I would recommend to stay away from diesel in general. High maintenance costs if broken and definitely not environmentally friendly at all.
The Euro stage V compliant Australian Skyactiv-D 2.2L has the following specifications:
The US EPA compliant US Skyactiv-D 2.2L has the following specifications:
- Power: 140 kW (190 hp) @ 4,500 rpm
- Torque: 450 N⋅m (330 lbf⋅ft) @ 2,000 rpm
- Fuel consumption (Australian ADR 81/02)
- Combined 5.7 L/100 km (41.3 mpg)
- City 6.5 L/100 km (36.2 mpg)
- Highway 5.2 L/100 km (45.2 mpg)
The US EPA compliant US Skyactiv-D 2.2L has the following specifications:
- Power: 168 hp @ 4,000 rpm
- Torque: 290 lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm
- EPA Estimated fuel economy:
- City 27 mpg
- Highway 30 mpg
Agreed, the emissions standards here in the U.S., driven by California's CARB standards are the most stringent in the world, hence the dramatic reduction in power and efficiency.
Mazda has confirmed that it will show a new fully electric vehicle later this year, as first reported by Automotive News.
Definitely not comparing VW to Mazda. I am making a general comment about diesel stating that it is old technology and its emissions are dangerous to human health, Mazda knows it as well and is making the leap to the future as per this news:
Mazda has confirmed that it will show a new fully electric vehicle later this year, as first reported by Automotive News.
Mazda has confirmed that it will show a new fully electric vehicle later this year, as first reported by Automotive News.
Regarding electric vehicles, how do you consider those "clean"? Unless 100% of the electricity is coming from renewable resources, the production of electricity just relocates where the environmental damage is happening.
Last edited by shipo; Sep 17, 2019 at 08:24 AM.
I'm thinking your blanket statement stating diesel emissions are dangerous to human is an arbitrary statement to support your arguments. The fact is, any internal combustion engine can be deemed "dangerous to human health". I would argue Mazda's technology brings diesel emissions more or less inline with gasoline engines, and coupled with the ease of harvesting diesel fuel from microalgae, one could argue it is even cleaner given how voracious a consumer of co2 those little plants are.
Regarding electric vehicles, how do you consider those "clean"? Unless 100% of the electricity is coming from renewable resources, the production of electricity just relocates where the environmental damage is happening.
Regarding electric vehicles, how do you consider those "clean"? Unless 100% of the electricity is coming from renewable resources, the production of electricity just relocates where the environmental damage is happening.
"Emissions from diesel vehicles have been reported to be significantly more harmful than those from petrol vehicles. Diesel combustion exhaust is a source of atmospheric soot and fine particles, which is a component of the air pollution implicated in human cancer, heart and lung damage, and mental functioning."
Last edited by mazda_nc_dude; Sep 17, 2019 at 08:56 AM.
From the internets:
"Emissions from diesel vehicles have been reported to be significantly more harmful than those from petrol vehicles. Diesel combustion exhaust is a source of atmospheric soot and fine particles, which is a component of the air pollution implicated in human cancer, heart and lung damage, and mental functioning."
"Emissions from diesel vehicles have been reported to be significantly more harmful than those from petrol vehicles. Diesel combustion exhaust is a source of atmospheric soot and fine particles, which is a component of the air pollution implicated in human cancer, heart and lung damage, and mental functioning."
First Diesel, then Petrol cars will be out-dated technology soon.


