Yet most of your response you do try.
Move on dude!!!

Look dude I am not trying to insult you, and my response was really poking fun at you. But the 2 terms are indicative of the sport and vehicle enthusiasts. Not to be categized in any fashion as you calling a member a grammar ****. If that were the case many members asking for help with concerns about their vehicles we could never as for better descriptive wording because a member like you would call that member asking a grammar ****. WOW!!! think about that for a monument while you stew in your chair and pound on your keyboard or cell phone to resound to me directly again defending yourself. LOL
You do realize that jokes sometime hit home and mine obviously did. LOL

Move on dude!!!

I can at least in part see why you "may" define what I did as a grammar **** but then maybe go re-read those 2 words of describing an action that you miss-used. You spelled them correctly and had they been the correct word would have fit perfectly in your responses. But they weren't! I often post this name towards a member that does it often and more about spelling and sentence structure not the use of a word mis used.
LOL
Move on dude!!!
The term "grammar ****" refers to a person who compulsively criticizes or corrects others' grammar, spelling, and punctuation mistakes. It is often used in a pejorative sense to describe someone who is overly strict about grammar rules and takes pleasure in pointing out others' errors, making them feel inferior for not adhering to proper standards. The term combines the concept of a "pedant" with a reference to the *****, highlighting the extreme nature of their corrections.


Move on dude!!!

 

trying to help someone on a forum doesn't mean you're a car guy it just means your trying to help...and i've stated on here i'm not a car guy quite a few times but i'll put it in my signature just for you so you can remember lol...anyway carry on cupcake

 

Well you just summed up what I sort of figured you were ! LOL
DUDE!

The term "cupcake" has multiple meanings and uses depending on the context:

• In a positive context, it can refer to a young woman who seeks the favor of powerful men, often used in discussions about sexual dynamics.
  
  1
• In a negative context, it is used to describe a gay man, with connotations that can vary from complimenting attractiveness to mocking effeminate qualities.
  
  1
• Additionally, "cupcake" can be used as a term of endearment or affection, suggesting sweetness and care.
  
  1
• The term has evolved in contemporary slang, often used in a playful or flirty manner among younger generations.
  
  1
  Overall, the usage of "cupcake" can be both flattering and derogatory, depending on the context in which it is employed.

 

Little performance tip for you about your Mazda. The drive-by-wire many that think they have floored it often don't. Unless you can see the % you would be surprised by a what it actually takes to get 100% WOT on the throttle body position. So your below average "slow" performance rating you posted is likely due in part by not achieving 100% on the TB.

 

No doubt --- Thats interesting -- and didnt consider it -- the CX-50 has a turbo and a hybrid --so why is the #1 seller dragging behind >?

 

0-60 --yeah Im going to say that depending on what fuel you use and keeping oil changes good with properly inflated tires/ and not towing ---0-60 on the CX5 is more than adequate - In fact LObsta you are correct and that most often merges onto the freeway you are already rolling and need little more to get up to speed - I use premium and thats made a difference as my now broken in my 2025 CX5 will easily hit 60 in under 7 seconds and thats not pushing it hard --so theres many factors - That alone never had me looking at the turbo -- possibly when I was 21 - 0-60 was a big deal -- now - cost to own and reliability / plus insurance ( turbos are more ) is what I consider -- but hey its a mute point now for the CX5 -- if you want turbo almost every other Mazda has it , 3 ,70,90 , 50 I must be missing a few -- but hey the #1 sports car in the world went Turbo I think 2 years and people didnt like it now its NA--The MIATA ? wonder why --0-60 was faster with turbo and that didnt do it --

 

I just read the copy quotes --which Im guessing another member posted --- I dont read everyones posts- / Yet any argument about how turbos have less parts --well I will just say / common sense - I want reliability and by not having a turbo -- the records indicate fewer issues and maintenance --so its not just money ---its time and potential inconvenience. I am interested is seeing how Mazda will integrate the Hybrid drive without the use of a CVT ?

 

Read again no one said a turbo has less parts

 

Not a chance your NA CX-5 is hitting 60 in under 7 seconds (unless you are driving off a cliff...)

 

His probably does go as quick as he says he’s using that fuel called bullsheeet.🤣